Monday, October 1, 2007

THINK ON THIS WHERES COMMON SENSE

DON'T MAKE ME YOURS I GUARANTEE ILL COVER THIS WITH FULL MEDIA AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS
WE ALREADY TALKED TODAY ABOUT THIS FINISHED ; WE TREATED YOU LIKE A KING AS YOU STAYED HERE 2 WEEKENDS
AS MY LADY GAVE YOU ENERGY TREATMENTS FOR FREE;; I GAVE MY TIME ALSO YES ALSO I GAVE YOU ALL THE URLS TO BUILD THE RIG
THREW EMAILS SINCE OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR PLEASE ALSO NOTE WE OUR HOME WAS UPSET WITH YOU SMOKING POT IN A CHURCH ORGANIZATION THIS MESSAGE COPIED AND PASTED TO ALL







g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig components parts manual problem; BE) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GNU
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29:53
> To:
> Cc:Ronald Pandolfi
> Subject: Re: Your high voltage rig
>
>
> Hi, Gordon – Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I’ve never met John HE, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He’s a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He’s clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he’s already been paid, though, then of course that’s a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn’t feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:19:20 +0000
> T
>
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Scarlatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GNU
>
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> 0000,0000,0000From:
>
Jack Sarfatti <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Date:
>
September 27, 2007 7:57:10 PM PDT
>
> 0000,0000,0000To: Gordon
> Novel <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Cc: Dan Smith
> <, Ronald Pandolfi <, Ken
> Shoulders <, Robert Shaheen <, leon
> lisbona <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Subject: Your high
> voltage rig
>
>

>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>

>


INTERESTING






g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig componets parts manual problem; B) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GN
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29:53
> Subject: Re: Your high voltage rig
>
>
> Hi, Gordon – Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I’ve never met John H, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He’s a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He’s clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he’s already been paid, though, then of course that’s a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn’t feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:19:20 +0000

>
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Sarfatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GN
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> 0000,0000,0000From:
>
Jack Sarfatti <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Date:
>
September 27, 2007 7:57:10 PM PDT
>
> 0000,0000,0000To: Gordon
> Novel <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Cc: Dan Smith
> <, Ronald Pandolfi <, Ken
> Shoulders <, Robert Shaheen <, leon
> lisbona <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Subject: Your high
> voltage rig
>
>

>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>

>


----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com
----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com

No comments: