Tuesday, December 18, 2007

MERRY XMASS FROM PARIS HILTON








Yes Babe.......... all those ones I sent, Thank You!!! -P


----- Original Message -----
From: johnhutchison
To: "PARIS HILTON"
Subject: Re: Merry Christmas
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 20:25:43 -0700


ok its done do you want my spaces pics young lady happy holidays back to you keep safe and do post in myspaces blog you have been silent to much geeeee happy new year
----- Original Message -----
From: PARIS HILTON
To: heffect@infinet.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 7:39 PM
Subject: Merry Christmas


Merry Christmas John ..I have been watching "BEYOND INVENTION "Great show kudos LOL Wishing you the best of the holiday season ..........The talk in Hollywood is your show is a go ahead WOW !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Tell Robert Hello From "Me" ok ? Please don not forward this email .OK !! But its ok to put on Your &Mine blogger space Hello to all my fans out there . I will be Posting A message on My spaces also John Post lots of Photographs of me these ones I like the best ....... Please Look over these to upload................. Hugs Paris W Hilton Or P LOL Happy New Year Also See my blog at my spaces

--
Got No Time? Shop Online for Great Gift Ideas!
mail.com Shopping


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





--
Got No Time? Shop Online for Great Gift Ideas!
mail.com Shopping

Thursday, December 6, 2007

Hey everyone,
i wanted to address Nichole's email.
First the biz part. One of the ideas behind the show is to demonstrate and show the world this kind of technology, and that it is real and exists and can be used for many good things. Within the show's budget are the necessary experiments funded and performed. The idea behind the show is not only to achieve this, but if we deficit finance the show ourselves (as opposed to the network funding it) then we have a good shot an owning it outright, which means owning foreign markets and ancillaries, which means at minimum doubling show revenue.
The important thing to realise is that the idea here is to make the show itself a 'safe' investment - ie investors know they're getting their money back no matter what because we've sold it to a network. If we own the show outright, then there is a further good investor return from foreign tv sales, dvds, ancillaries, etc. The other part of that 'owning it' puzzle is organising the sponsors and product placement, which i am working on now with one of the largest if not the top product placement companies here in town, Legacy. Coincidentally, i have been in talks with them about partnering on the space show, and the owner loves and funds and invests in new technology - and last week he brought John's name up out of the blue when we were talking about future science. Literally Nichole this was the day before you called. Serendipity, as they say.
So i think it's really important to recognise that step one for me is making sure investors feel secure they're getting their money back no matter what, and John's experiments get performed and the world gets to see them. This establishes John as the real deal, and importantly people get to know who he is and what he's about from the show, including personality-wise and philosophically, and his unique circle of friends, which adds a bonus.

Undoubtedly because of such exposure, John will get a new flood of offers for all kinds of ventures, but while the show company is not looking to own any patents, what potentially could be done for show investors is what is called in Hollywood a 'first-look' deal - in essense where the show investors have the right to 'first-pitch' John for their own individual ventures, and John gives those investors priority over the other people who pitch him 'like' projects, and also gives the show investors the right to match any best offer for that venture. It's all about relationships and trust anyway, so if we organise the show, everyone in that group appreciates and trusts each other anyway, which in the end is what everyone wants. i've never mentioned this potential clause to Rob or John before, it came to me thinking this through, but i think everyone would agree it's reasonable and fair and fits this situation as far as business is concerned and would make everyone happy for now and in the future.

Additionally as far as how the business of the show can also be structured - this also could be done as Rockwell Collins coming in as a corporate tv show sponsor. Besides deficit financing, the other half of getting a show on the air is filling out the commercial hour with sponsors. Rockwell Collins undoubtedly has an advertising budget, so show sponsorship could potentially come out of that. i'm talking to several other potential people/groups who could deficit finance show productions costs, so i'm just piecing all this together, and i thought i'd throw out there that Rockwell Collins could come in on that commercial sponsorship level too, and could play some great ads we could even help them make at cost in return for sponsorship (i began my career in commercials - did over 100, major top national brands).

As far as addressing the skeptics - well, John gave the knock-out list. From my area, there is plenty of video from independent production companies from many countries that have come and shot their own footage themselves, witnessing everything themselves. In putting together the US tv pitch, i will probably string some of this footage together and will forward it to you. This on top of credible scientists like Hathaway who have been with John.
Taking this further, i'd like any skeptic to consider the amount of times John has been on everything from Fox to Discovery Ch - this year a nice spike in appearances alone. Why? Because he can't do it? If he couldn't, and all those crews from around the world and witnessed and shot their own footage themselves and broadcast it but knew it wasn't real would all liable for fraud. Japanese tv, Discovery Ch., Fox (who i'm in negotiations with now for space show), etc. -- they're all in some sort of conspiracy together to enable this fraud? Of course not. People here have greenlighted broadcasting the information, and we have an opportunity to guide that the right way now besides John being a segment or guest on somebody elses show.
Also, my agency is CAA, and i would never risk my relationship with them over something i didn't think was real - never ever - if this was fake this could be career-shattering stuff for me, so i thought i'd throw that in. People tend to think that Hollywood is all about red carpets and premeires and parties, but i assure you it is not. It is run on pure, cold and very hard business, and getting the agency's backing is a big deal here as CAA is the most powerful and influential agency in this town. If they back it, your credibility with the networks goes up by ten, and you have them negotiating your deal - which is substantial.
Also, why would John risk his credibility by agreeing to a television show and then not being able to do anything? Bones laid bare there.
A few months back i asked John to float specific objects (potential sponsors products) and within two days he sent me the footage.
Just want to emphasise that besides my personal full confidence in John, there is also solid business structure involved here that protects the private investor and is beneficial to the corporate investor. In other words, there are multiple options, which is nice.
Hope this helps. i'm working on the show outline now - been going over mountains of material and rehaving my mind blown. Also makes my mind race with the scientists/mathematicians i know i'd love to have John visit on the show for an episode. Will be done with this within a few days. Biz-wise i have approvable showrunners avail from CAA, but meeting one in a few days who works for Mark Burnett and has been offered three shows by Discovery and has turned them all down because he'd have to relocate to NY and doesn't want to. This show would be run out of here, and he likes the topic.
Let me know if i can give any more info about anything, or answer any questions regarding anything above.
Cheers, kevin

satinverse@aol.com wrote:
John who can put your work into a business plain to present your work professionally to investors. What happen in 1991?? Tod said something about you not being able to reproduce your work. Pluse we have to show your Hutchinson cell an the other stuff your working on. Tod seem's to be lacking the info on you an couldn't find much when he goggled you. I have to show him your the real deal. There's still some skeptic people out there when it come to you i guess. So if Kevin or Robert whom ever can help with this I'll be able to show Tod an get things going on this end, it's sad people here in America are so reluctant to new age science you really have to have your work in a presentation that is credible an persuasive for investors to really even look at your work. Love you much miss ya silly hobbit let's getter done aye :) Southern Hobbit cheers
P.s. who are some of the scientist you have work with an can account for you work??

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More new features than ever. Check out the new AOL Mail!





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Thursday, October 4, 2007

i talked to her on the forum once. She sounds like a good person at heart, but having her on your show is like mixing water with oil.
your Bro for life(your stuck with me, ahhhhhh) xxxxxxxxx


Thank you for returning our property.. I'll bet you $1500.00 to your
$15.00 this affair will in the years to come be looked upon by yourself
and your lovely wife as your greatest financial mistake as even your
friend Paul Mueller has said in writing you provided us with nothing of
any value for our hard earned money much less the well discussed, defined
and agreed to rig compnents parts manual. You and facts don't get
along well I've sadly discovered. How does it feel to take someone's money
and give them nothing you agreed to???

Blocking my e-mails is a cowardly thing to do John. My belief now is
you never intended to do the task once you discovered some real work was
involved and were willing to sacrifice our friendship and a huge.very
real fortune for a lousy $1.500.00 dollars. I find you and this dumb
affair very sad as I really liked and admired you. Tell Paris hello for
me.

GN
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

more reality soap

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/novel_memo.htm

INTERESTING HOW YOUR FUNDING DISTRIBUTION IS GETTING CHANGED WITH EACH E-MAIL,
WARNINGS FROM PREVIOUS ASSOCIATES AND THE ABOVE ATTACHMENTS REGARDING ALSO YOUR AFFILIATIONS WITH THE GOVERNMENT CIA. WHICH DISCLOSE YOU HAVE NOT HAD ANY AFFILIATIONS WITH THE CIA ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL DOCUMENT SENT TO ME.
GORDON IN LIEU OF THE MESSAGES YOU LEFT THAT ARE NOT PROFESSIONAL MUCH LESS COMMON COURTESY OF THE WARMTH YOU WERE REGARDED WITH HERE IN OUR HOME.

I WOULD APPRECIATE YOU REFLECTING ON WHAT WAS SAID AND WHEN I STARTED HELPING WITH NO FUNDING, ABSOLUTELY NONE,... FROM YOU LAST OCTOBER . MY TIME IS VALUABLE AS WELL.
I DON'T LIKE CONFRONTATION OR THE LANGUAGE YOU USE WHICH IS TOTALLY UNNECESSARY.

THE HELP I GAVE AND THE TWO WEEKENDS YOU SPENT WAS TO BE PAID FOR BY WHAT YOU STATED WAS TO BE ORIGINALLY $2,OOO. NOT WHAT YOU SENT AND THE IDEA TO TIE PARIS HILTON AND THE INAPPROPRIATE SUGGESTIONS AND THE NONSENSE INCLUDED.

PROFESSIONAL SERIOUS INDIVIDUALS PRESENT CONTRACTS AND REAL MONEY TO THE TABLE.
WHY DON'T YOU GET THE GOING RATE FOR EXAMPLE ON WHAT A CONTRACTOR WOULD ACCEPT FOR A FILM AND WHAT YOU SUGGEST AS A FEE. PLEASE GET A SOME QUOTES AND SEE WHAT REALISTIC PEOPLE IN THIS INDUSTRY GET PAID FOR FILM MUCH LESS THE PROJECT YOU ARE THINKING ON THE SCALE OF IT.

AS FOR YOUR UNKIND COMMENTS REGARDING YOUR INFORMATION REPORTS AND DOCUMENTS LEFT, I ASKED YOU NOT TO LEAVE IT TO BEGIN WITH AND ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS HAVE ASKED YOU TO PICK IT UP AND YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO BE GETTING IT ON ONE OF YOUR MANY TRAVELS FROM THE SOUTH AND THEN GOING SOUTH THEN WHEN YOU WERE GOING TO VEGAS AND AGAIN WHEN YOU WERE GOING TO DESERT PALMS TO YOUR RESORT STAY. AT DR. ELIZABETH A RAUSCHER WHO BY THE WAY , KEPT STATING." YOU NEVER BRING YOUR CHECK BOOK" , TO BACK UP YOU REQUEST AND QUERY PEOPLE FOR INFORMATION SO YOU DON'T GET ANSWERS BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE ANY ONE SERIOUS WOULD LIKE TO BE RESPECTED FOR THEIR TIME AND KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERTISE. I REQUESTED AND STATED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS WHEN YOU WOULD PICK IT UP ?

I DON'T WANT IT, OR NEED IT, AND HAVE NOT THE INTEREST TO KEEP IT, YOU ASKED TO LEAVE IT HERE, REMEMBER ?
SO STOP WITH THE INCONSIDERATION AND VULGAR PHONE CALLS IT IS COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY.
YOUR STORIES VARY WITH EACH PHONE CALL, AND PEOPLE CALLING AND WARNING ME NOT TO HAVE ANY AFFILIATION WITH YOU DUE TO NOT ACTING PROFESSIONAL ON THE SCALE OF BEHAVIOR , CONTRACT, COMMITMENT AND WHAT YOU DEMAND YOU SAY ONE THING AND DO ANOTHER.

I WISH YOU WELL BUT, THE ABSURD AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT YOU GAVE ME DOESN'T REMOTELY COVER WHAT I HAVE DONE AND DID FOR YOU. WHICH BY THE WAY AGAIN YOU STATED WAS TO COVER FOR THE 2 WEEKENDS YOU TOOK MY TIME FROM MY OTHER PROJECTS AND FAMILY.
THE OTHERS YOU MENTIONED ON THIS PROJECT THAT WERE LEAVING OR WHO NEVER GOT ON BOARD TO BEGIN WITH, WERE DUE TO THE LACK OF FUNDING AND WHEN QUESTIONED AS TO THE STUDIOS AND COMMITMENT OF PEOPLE SERIOUS YOU DIDN'T RESPOND. REMEMBER???

PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE IN THE INDUSTRY DO NOT ACT AS THIS AND CONTRACTS ARE SIGNED AND TIME AND BUDGETS SET WITH MEETINGS AND REAL DISCUSSIONS TO REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE RIG AND WHAT IT NEEDS IS DONE. NOT THE SUBJECTS YOU ALSO DISCUSSED. WHICH WERE COMMON VULGARITY AND DISRESPECTFUL.

SO I WISH YOU WELL. BUT I TRULY PREFER TO DO A JOB PROFESSIONALLY AND NOT WITH THE UNKINDNESS AND UNAPPRECIATED BEHAVIOR YOU HAVE DISPLAYED ON THE PHONE AND IN OUR HOME. INCLUDING THE SMOKING OF POT IN OUR HOME!!!! YOU HAVE HURT US AND NOT VALUED WHAT WAS GIVEN WHICH CAME FROM GOOD FAITH AND HEART. WHICH MET WITH YOUR VULGARITY AND DISRESPECT.

THE TECHNOLOGY THAT WAS PRESENTED TO ME IS ARCHAIC AND OUTDATED, AND HAS BEEN DONE AND FAILED, WHICH YOU KNOW. BECAUSE YOU STATED SO AND YOU WANTED TO PROVE A POINT RESENTFUL OF THE WAY YOU WERE TREATED FROM THE GOVERNMENT BOYS IN THE PAST, REMEMBER YOU WANTED TO FLY IN THEIR BACKYARD REMEMBER??? ACCORDING TO YOUR STATEMENTS HERE.

THE DOD SBIR PROGRAM THAT I AM A MEMBER OF FOR SOMETIME, SHOWS ADVANCED NEW TECHNOLOGY ON ANTI GRAVITY. YOU OUGHT TO REFER TO.
THE CIA'S 00B SERIES OF UFO REPORTS LOCATED AT THE CIA HEADQUARTERS THAT IF YOU WERE A MEMBER OR AFFILIATED OR SIMPLE GO THROUGH FOIA, YOU WOULD BE ASSIGNED A PRIVACY
CO-ORDINATOR ,... WHO WOULD REQUEST INFO AND THEN WOULD INVITE YOU THERE AS PER THEIR CFR RULINGS TO PHOTO COPYING CHARGES AND RULES OF CONDUCT WHILE ON THE PREMISES.
BUT YOU AGAIN WOULD KNOW OF THIS HAD YOU BEEN THERE.

PLEASE REFRAIN FROM CONTACTING US AND ME. THIS WAS THE KINDNESS YOU SHOW PEOPLE WHO GAVE A HAND IN WHAT YOU WANTED TO DO. SO MUCH FOR MANKIND AND IMPROVING HUMAN RELATIONS WHEN YOU PUSH EVERYONE AWAY, IN YOUR WORLD.
BE WELL AND TAKE CARE.
----- Original Message -----
From: John Hutchison
To: froni
Subject: Fw: gordon novel and hutchison titans



----- Original Message -----
From: John Hutchison
To:
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 8:04 PM
Subject: gordon novel and hutchison titans


Adding to this I received phone calls from scientists who dropped off the scene as well as your sponsors as well as Hollywood film makers why they phone me ? warning me? lots anyway Gordon I worked a long time with urls for the engineering firms who would supply your team with how to build a flywheel ; d.c motors as well as switching units from Germany I hope you found that information o.k. as I understood this project it was to be high tech NOT INVOLVING PARIS HILTON WHO WAS WRITING ON ANOTHER TOPIC a comment you made anyway bitching and complaining does never works in getting any project going so 1500.00 is peanuts to what I get IN MY WORK MAN THE FELLOW PHONED ME UP ABOUT YOUR OR MONEY HE GAVE YOU REMEMBER ?????????PEACE CHILL OUT
----- Original Message ---


DON'T MAKE ME YOURS I GUARANTEE ILL COVER THIS WITH FULL MEDIA AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS
WE ALREADY TALKED TODAY ABOUT THIS FINISHED ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; WE TREATED YOU LIKE A KING AS YOU STAYED HERE 2 WEEKENDS
AS MY LADY GAVE YOU ENERGY TREATMENTS FOR FREE;; I GAVE MY TIME ALSO YES ALSO I GAVE YOU ALL THE URLS TO BUILD THE RIG
THREW EMAILS SINCE OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR PLEASE ALSO NOTE WE OUR HOME WAS UPSET WITH YOU SMOKING POT IN A CHURCH ORGANIZATION THIS MESSAGE COPIED AND PASTED TO ALL GORDON COOL IT THE RIG CANNOT BE BUILT WITH SO MANY FOLKS BITCHING AT EACH OTHER I GOT MY PRIORITIES


Thank you for visiting CNN.com, a Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. site. Your privacy is important to us. To better protect your privacy, we provide this statement explaining our online information practices and the choices you can make about the way your information is collected and used at this Turner site.






g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig components parts manual problem; BE) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GNU
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29:53
> To:
> Cc:Ronald Pandolfi
> Subject: Re: Your high voltage rig
>
>
> Hi, Gordon - Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I've never met John HE, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He's a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He's clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he's already been paid, though, then of course that's a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn't feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:19:20 +0000
> To: Ronald Pandolfi
> Cc: >
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Scarlatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GNU
>
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> 0000,0000,0000From:
>
Jack Sarfatti <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Date:
>
September 27, 2007 7:57:10 PM PDT
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>

>


INTERESTING






g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig componets parts manual problem; B) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GN
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29
>
>
> Hi, Gordon - Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I've never met John H, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He's a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He's clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he's already been paid, though, then of course that's a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn't feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> D
>
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Sarfatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GN
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com
----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com

Monday, October 1, 2007

THINK ON THIS WHERES COMMON SENSE

DON'T MAKE ME YOURS I GUARANTEE ILL COVER THIS WITH FULL MEDIA AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS
WE ALREADY TALKED TODAY ABOUT THIS FINISHED ; WE TREATED YOU LIKE A KING AS YOU STAYED HERE 2 WEEKENDS
AS MY LADY GAVE YOU ENERGY TREATMENTS FOR FREE;; I GAVE MY TIME ALSO YES ALSO I GAVE YOU ALL THE URLS TO BUILD THE RIG
THREW EMAILS SINCE OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR PLEASE ALSO NOTE WE OUR HOME WAS UPSET WITH YOU SMOKING POT IN A CHURCH ORGANIZATION THIS MESSAGE COPIED AND PASTED TO ALL







g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig components parts manual problem; BE) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GNU
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29:53
> To:
> Cc:Ronald Pandolfi
> Subject: Re: Your high voltage rig
>
>
> Hi, Gordon – Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I’ve never met John HE, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He’s a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He’s clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he’s already been paid, though, then of course that’s a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn’t feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:19:20 +0000
> T
>
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Scarlatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GNU
>
> Sent via Blackberry by AT&TO
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> 0000,0000,0000From:
>
Jack Sarfatti <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Date:
>
September 27, 2007 7:57:10 PM PDT
>
> 0000,0000,0000To: Gordon
> Novel <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Cc: Dan Smith
> <, Ronald Pandolfi <, Ken
> Shoulders <, Robert Shaheen <, leon
> lisbona <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Subject: Your high
> voltage rig
>
>

>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>

>


INTERESTING






g.novel@yahoo.com wrote:

> John:
>
> I am not the one who said he could do the job, took our money and then didn't
> perform. You have been legally requested to either do as you agreed or return
> our money.
>
> Moreover, you have our personal research property we also trusted you with. You
> have been requested to return it forthwith. You are not responding to our
> e-mails. If I don't hear from you immediately as to: A) How you intend to
> resolve this rig componets parts manual problem; B) When can we expect the
> return of our personal property???
>
> Should I not hear from you promptly as to properly resolving this matter, you
> can expect to hear from David Hardy Esq. our RAM Teams civil counsel in Tucson,
> Arizona preparatory to you forcing us to taking legal action to recover our
> money and our property. John, face, money and our Team's research work is not
> something you want to play games with as it will inevitably cost you one way or
> another dearly.
>
> I genuinely like and admire you but I don't like a little bit how you have
> treated me since WE overpaid you. We can likely work this out PROVIDED you
> intend to keep your end of our agreement. However, be damn well advised that I
> am not known for tolerating double-dealers and fools well at all.
>
> I suggest you call me before David calls you as I would prefer we remain
> friends because you really cannot afford me for a foe. Those cc's are all
> lawyers who will join into this should that be required.
>
> You will recall that I previously told you I was immediately prepared to make a
> third trip to Phoenix to work with and help you do this task as you agreed to
> do. Beyond that I cannot and will not go. The payback lagniappe for this
> unnecessary grief that I want for the extra $500.00 WE gave you is a meeting
> with Paris Hilton.
>
> Please don't make me your enemy!
>
> GN
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Ryan and Kerry Cassidy
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 01:29:53
> Subject: Re: Your high voltage rig
>
>
> Hi, Gordon – Bill here, sending to you and Ron only re this.
>
> I’ve never met John H, but have a keen idea of his personality and aptitudes.
> He’s a brilliant and inspired intuitive hands-on experimenter but you can see
> from his e-mails that writing anything at all, or operating formally and
> systematically, is not his bag or his training. He’s clearly a nice guy who is
> keen to help, but I suspect he is maybe disorganized and chaotic and could well
> have volunteered beyond his capability.
>
> Go easy on him: he may well simply have agreed to something he should not have
> done. (If he’s already been paid, though, then of course that’s a problem.)
>
> I was flabbergasted at Sarfatti too! Maybe he wasn’t feeling well :)
>
> Very best as always -
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ----------------
> From:
> Reply-To:
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:19:20 +0000

>
> Ron:
>
> What has caused this sea change in Sarfatti's attitude towards the feasibility
> of RAM? To say I am shocked is to clearly understate the case. Flabbergasted
> fits the bill better. This amounts to a ringing endorsement from formerly a
> very harsh critic.
>
> John Hutchison has not even remotely come close to keeping his end of the
> simple science bargain to produce the rig component parts manual. Why he
> elected to do this to myself and the RAM Team only he knows.
>
> Very sad because I greatly admired him as an honorable person. We overpaid him
> to do this and it doesn't make sense a twit. When the Team hears all the
> details his reputation will suffer greatly - though he really doesn't seem to
> care.
>
> GN
>
> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Sarfatti
>
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:25:41
> To:Gordon Novel
> Subject: Fwd: Your high voltage rig
>
>
>
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
> 0000,0000,0000From:
>
Jack Sarfatti <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Date:
>
September 27, 2007 7:57:10 PM PDT
>
> 0000,0000,0000To: Gordon
> Novel <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Cc: Dan Smith
> <, Ronald Pandolfi <, Ken
> Shoulders <, Robert Shaheen <, leon
> lisbona <
>
> 0000,0000,0000Subject: Your high
> voltage rig
>
>

>
> Hi Gordon
>
> If I can get Dan Smith to come out here in early December we will
> drive to Palm Springs to see you and I will introduce you to my friend
> Don who lives out there part of the year. Don was a Reagan banking
> economics advisor and a business associate of William Colby. Maybe Ken
> Shoulders can build your rig? If he thinks he can I certainly support
> someone providing the funds for Ken to do that. It's worth trying to
> see what happens. :-)
>
>
>

>


----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com
----------------------------------------------
John Hutchison
www.hutchisoneffect.com